Question 1

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 2

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 3

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Other FAQs

Can I use improvised tourniquets on a child?

Is CPR different for children in drowning?

What are signs of compartment syndrome I should watch for?

How do red flags fit with my safeguarding responsibilities?

Can I use a school’s spare auto-injector on a child without their own device?

Can anaphylaxis happen without a rash?

Let's talk about what you need

Alan C.