Question 1

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 2

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 3

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Other FAQs

How can organisations reduce fractures and sprains at work or in venues?

What should I record after the incident?

How can organisations reduce choking risk?

How can I tell if a child is ‘just upset’ or in true shock?

Should I still give rescue breaths if I’m worried about infection?

What is the difference between normal and ‘catastrophic’ bleeding?

Let's talk about what you need

Alan C.