Question 1

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 2

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Question 3

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Accepted Answer

Life-threatening dangers such as fire, building collapse or rising water may require immediate movement regardless of spinal risk; in such cases, use the safest drag or lift you can and prioritise getting the casualty to safety. Once in a safe place, minimise further movement.

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Is it better not to move someone at all, even if they are in danger?

Other FAQs

Do all bruises after a fall need a doctor?

How can we reduce dehydration risk in our settings?

Can anaphylaxis happen without a rash?

What should organisations record about suspected dehydration incidents?

How can workplaces and venues reduce chest injury risks?

When should I not put a child in the recovery position?

Let's talk about what you need

Alan C.